Friday, March 4, 2011

Changing the blog as I finish Proust

I think this will become my reading blog, as I finish Proust. With that said, I have a comment on the books I have been plowing through - to improve my writing and to enjoy at work. I have been reading Robert B. Parker and Dick Francis, along with a few other things. I have been reading electronic copies of Parker, and used paperbacks of Francis. Other than the obvious, that I personally enjoy reading on the computer over a book format, I have found the cut-off point that delineates Parker's writing. He, Parker, reached a certain point when his writing and plotting did change. Though there are still a few good books sprinkled amidst the remaining Spenser novels, after 1985, and the book _A Catskill Eagle_, his writing took on a much simpler tone, dialogue driven, and much more written to a developing format that would be often repeated (sometimes ad nauseum). Here is a list, courtesy of the fine Mystery genre website stop, you're killing me of the titles in the Spenser series up to the cut-off point:

The Godwulf Manuscript (1973)

God Save the Child (1974)

Mortal Stakes (1975)

Promised Land (1976)
1977 Edgar Award for Best Mystery

The Judas Goat (1978)

Looking for Rachel Wallace (1980)

Early Autumn (1981)
Finalist 1982 Shamus Award for Best Novel

A Savage Place (1981)

Ceremony (1982)
Finalist 1983 Shamus Award for Best Novel

The Widening Gyre (1983)
Finalist 1984 Shamus Award for Best Novel

Valediction (1984)

A Catskill Eagle (1985)
Finalist 1986 Shamus Award for Best Novel

I have just finished _Valediction_ and hope to download _A Catskill Eagle_ today. I will continue to explore the books, but I doubt I will download many more beyond this point.

Slow and slower

To be brief I am having trouble finishing. I have only read a few pages since my last post and I have been off on a reading tear with other things that are directed toward learning to write, in particular learning to write dialogue between characters. I still can't get over how many times, in the modern 20th or 21st century novel (genre based albeit) you need to write "he said" or "she said" - such a burden compared to Proust.

I still have not found anything better than Melville to compare to Proust, not Dickens, or Dostoevsky, or Turgenev, or Tolstoy. I keep searching and have not found anything as readable or as ironic.

Proust is really ripping the cover off of the plot now and giving us the complete and unalterable truth, this is the true heart of this book - this is the true and unforgiving expose of what is happening all comments about the actual plot aside this is Proust's real effort; to show us how we remember and what memory does to thought and what thought does to time. Quotes to follow to support this opinion.

Thursday, February 24, 2011

Electronic reading

In thinking about the reading I have done in Proust, I far and away enjoy the electronic time I have spent reading. I have purchased more electronic books and plan to continue to build my electronic library. To the point of getting a separate hard disc to function like a bookcase for ebooks.

Monday, February 21, 2011

Taking a break

I have been taking a break from Proust for the last week or so. My reasons involve being stressed and tired, not wanting the book to end, and my writing project. I have been analyzing R.B.P. and D.F. toward writing style, in particular conversation, as that is hard to get from Proust and is not modern enough.

Thursday, February 17, 2011

Pushing and waiting

Now that I approach the end of the book cycle I find myself reluctant to finish as I do not want these books to end. After all of the words and distractions that come from life and interrupt reading I still want more of this beautiful story.

Saturday, February 12, 2011

Quotes and stuff

I have been marking pages to post quotes. The book is getting quite introspective after the momentous occurrences. I know that I will need to read all of these books again.

Sunday, February 6, 2011

Serious

The fact of the matter is that we as readers do not know who is speaking in the books. There is a brief comment to this end at one point but we are left not really knowing who this is who is speaking to us. Is this an imaginary character or is it the author? Are we being told a fictional story or is this based in fact? Do we clearly see the ambiguity or is the intent to leave us set in the quagmire that is unknowing? I am not sure that any of these questions will be answered.